« Working on the business, not in it | Main | Merchant Services: 6 questions to ask! »


Carolyn Elefant

I don't agree with website disclaimers in most cases and frankly, they don't work for attorneys. An attorney's actions are going to be judged by their content. Thus, if an attorney website (or conduct through the website) looks and feels like the initiation of relationship with a client or unauthorized practice of law, that's how the condcut will be judged - and the disclamer won't make a difference one way or another. For proof, see my past post on this case

The comments to this entry are closed.

Multi RSS

  • Subscribe to RSS Feed


  • Notice
    This blog is made available by the lawyer publisher for educational purposes only as well as to give information and a general understanding of the law, not to provide specific legal advice. By using this blog site you understand that there is no attorney client relationship between you and the Blog publisher. The Blog should not be used as a substitute for competent legal advice from a licensed professional attorney in your state. Jonathan G. Stein, is licensed to practice law in the state of California only. ATTORNEY ADVERTISEMENT